前日参加活动, 中间有个团队小游戏比拼活动, 是NASA的一道测试题:

排序你在迫降到月球上完好无损的15件物品的重要程度

原版文件

来自NASA的原版Survival Exercise

题目从21页开始, 这里简单截取题目的部分, 不详述PDF中的其他内容

1 How would you rank these items to survive on the Moon in 2025?

Place the number 1 by the most important item and continue numbering to 15 to indicate the least important item. Beside each item, write your reasons for giving the item its ranking and explain how you plan to use the item to help you survive.

将数字 1 放在最重要的项目旁边，并继续编号到 15 以表示最不重要的项目。 在每件物品旁边， 写下你给物品排序的理由，并解释你打算如何使用物品来帮助你生存。

1.1 物品列表

• Life raft (自充气救生艇)

  a self-inflatable floatation device

• Two 45.5-kilogram (100-pound) tanks of oxygen (两罐氧气)

  pressurized tanks of oxygen

• Space blanket (防辐射毯)

  a thin sheet of plastic material that is coated with a metallic reflecting layer

• Lights with solar-powered rechargeable batteries (太阳能充电灯)

  portable lights powered by solar batteries

• Signal mirror (反光镜)

  a handheld mirror

• 38 liters (10 gallons) of water (38升水)

  a container of water

• First aid kit (急救箱)

  a basic first aid kit with pain medication and medicine for infection

• Food concentrate (压缩食品)

  dehydrated food to which water is added

• Magnetic compass (指南针)

  a tool that uses a magnetic field to determine direction

• Solar-powered radio receiver-transmitter (太阳能无线电收发器)

  a communication tool powered by the sun

• Map of the Moon’s surface (月图)

  a map showing the Moon’s terrain

• 15 meters (about 50 feet) of nylon rope (15米尼龙绳)

  manufactured rope

• Parachute (降落伞)

  a large piece of silk cloth

• Space suit repair kit (太空服修补剂)

  materials to repair tiny holes in fabric

• Box of matches (一盒火柴)

  wooden sticks with sulfur-treated heads

我玩的版本

1 NASA测试

首先自己独立判断得出物品重要性的排序, 填在下表中Step1列中, 然后在小组内讨论协商得到团队的物品重要性排序, 填在下表的Step2列中, 然后将NASA的参考答案填入Step3列中, 比较Step1与Step3的差值, 计算总和, 比较Step2与Step3的差值, 计算总和.

差值总和越小, 生存概率越大, 在游戏中, 我自己的差值是34, 团队讨论后得到的差值是16, 还算不错. (原表已丢失, 只记得差值总和)

1.1 物品列表

我要说的

1 指南针

指南针真的是我第一个判断出的东西, 月球被潮汐锁定没有自转, 且月球核心已冷却没有流动的地幔, 所以不存在稳定的南北两极, 所以指南针绝对用不了, 这算是冷知识把.

2 团队协作

然后团队协作一定程度上能得到1+1>2的成果, 譬如我们组取得了更低的差值, 得到了更高的生存概率.

3 总结

综上, 觉得这个测试很有意思, 就记录在这里, 以供观瞻.